Contenuto dell'articolo principale

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: due to the nature of Evidence-Based Practice and its relevance to nursing, the skills that it requires should be integrated in the healthcare degree programs. Therefore, the Evidence-Based Practice process should be introduced in the nursing education program to strengthen the students' independence and self-learning skills. The evaluation of the effectiveness of the academic teaching and the assessment of the competence degree achieved by students are hindered by the lack of validated assessment instruments. In the Italian context, today there is no instrument to assess the knowledge, skills and attitudes to Evidence-Based Practice.

OBJECTIVE: the authors aimed at validating, for the Italian context, the Evidence-Based Practice Evaluation Competence Questionnaire (EBP-COQ).
METHODS: this study was an Italian linguistic and cultural adaptation of a research instrument. To this end, the Beaton and Sousa Model were used. These models require six phases and aim at producing a pre-final version of the instrument to be submitted to a sample of nursing students.

RESULTS: Each item has reached a content validity index (I-CVI) value equal to or greater than 0.9 and a scale validity index (S-CVI) value of 0.992 for the whole questionnaire. The study has confirmed the reliability of the instrument's internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.892. The reliability of the test–retest confirms the stability of the questionnaire over time (Pearson's r = 0.976). The factorial analysis confirmed the construct validity.

CONCLUSION: the instrument has been validated in its psychometric characteristics and is ready to be administered to Italian nursing students.
KEYWORDS:Professional Competence, Evidence-Based Practice, Nursing Students, Questionnaire

Italian Validation of Evidence Based Practice Evaluation Competence Questionnaire (EBP-COQ)

INTRODUZIONE: per la natura dell'Evidence-Based Practice e per la sua rilevanza per l'infermieristica, le abilità che richiede dovrebbero essere una componente dell'educazione nei Corsi di Laurea di primo livello. Per questo il processo dell'Evidence-Based Practice dovrebbe essere introdotto precocemente nella formazione infermieristica per sviluppare negli studenti indipendenza e abilità di autoapprendimento. La valutazione dell'efficacia dell'insegnamento nella formazione universitaria e la valutazione del grado di competenza raggiunto dagli studenti vengono ostacolati da un'assenza di strumenti di valutazione validati. Nel contesto italiano non esiste ad oggi uno strumento per valutare conoscenze, competenze e attitudini all'Evidence-Based Practice.

OBIETTIVO: scopo di questo studio è validare per il contesto italiano l'Evidence Based Practice Evaluation Competence Questionnaire (EBP-COQ).

METODI: validazione e adattamento linguistico-culturale di uno strumento di accertamento delle competenze EBP negli studenti infermieri. Per condurre il processo di validazione e di adattamento linguistico-culturale sono stati assunti i modelli di Beaton e di Sousa. Questi modelli richiedono sei fasi e hanno l'obiettivo di produrre una versione pre-finale dello strumento pronta per essere somministrata ad un campione di studenti infermieri.

RISULTATI: ogni item ha raggiunto un valore di Content Validity Index (I-CVI) pari o superiore a 0.9 e un valore di Scale Validity Index (S-CVI) di 0.992 per tutto il questionario. Lo studio ha confermato l'affidabilità della coerenza interna dello strumento con un valore complessivo di Alpha di Cronbach di 0,892. L'affidabilità del test-retest conferma la stabilità dello strumento nel tempo (r di Pearson 0,976). L'analisi fattoriale ha confermato la validità di costrutto.

CONCLUSIONI: lo strumento è stato validato nelle sue caratteristiche psicometriche ed è pronto per essere somministrato agli studenti infermieri italiani
PAROLE CHIAVE: Competenza professionale, Evidence-Based Practice; studenti infermieri, questionario

Dettagli dell'articolo

Come citare
Finotto, S., & Garofalo, E. (2020). Italian Validation of Evidence Based Practice Evaluation Competence Questionnaire (EBP-COQ). PROFESSIONI INFERMIERISTICHE, 73(2). Recuperato da https://profinf.net/pro3/index.php/IN/article/view/766

Riferimenti

  • Beaton, D.E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M.B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self- report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25(24), 3186–3191.
  • Ciliska, D.K., Pinelli, J., DiCenso, A., & Cullum, N. (2001). Resources to enhance evidence-based nursing practice. AACN
  • Clinical Issues, 12(4), 520-8.
  • D'Aliesio, L., Vellone, E., Rega, M.L., & Galletti, C. (2006).
  • L'insegnamento della ricerca infermieristica nel corso di laurea e laurea specialistica: le opinioni dei professori associati e dei ricercatori di scienze infermieristiche. Professioni Infermieristiche, 59(2), 71-83.
  • Emanuel, V., Day, K., Diegnan, L., & Pryce-Miller, M. (2012). Developing evidence-based practice among students. Nursing Times, 107(49-50), 21–23.
  • European Commission. Il processo di Bologna e lo Spazio europeo dell'istruzione superiore. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/ education/policy/higher-education/bologna-process_it. Accessed date: 09 November 2018.
  • Fabbri, C., & Montalti, M. (2003). Evidence-based Nursing e formazione. Nursing Oggi, 8(2), 29-32.
  • Fenucci, R. (2001). Ricerca infermieristica: sfida di ieri necessití di oggi. Professioni Infermieristiche, 54(2), 199-201.
  • Finotto, S., Chiesi, I., Mecugni, D., Casali, P., Braglia, R., Doro, L.M.G., Regnani, S., & Lusetti, S. (2010). Evidence-based practice in nursing curricula: the experience of nursing degree course of Reggio Emilia. A pilot study. Professioni Infermieristiche, 63(3), 161-171.
  • Funk, S., Champagne, M., Wiese, R. & Tornquist, E. (1991). BARRIERS: The barriers to research utilization scale. Applied Nursing Research, 4(1), 39–45.
  • Greiner, A.C., & Knebel, E., (2003). Health Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Health Professions Education Summit. Washington DC: National Academies Press (US).
  • Hilton, A., & Skrutkowski, M. (2002). Translating instruments into other languages: development and testing processes. Cancer Nursing, 25(1), 1–7.
  • Hung, H.Y., Huang, Y.F., Tsai, J.J., & Chang, Y.J. (2015). Current state of evidence-based practice education for undergraduate nursing students in Taiwan: A questionnaire study. Nurse Education Today, 35 (12), 1262–1267.
  • Jette, D., Bacon, K., Batty, C., Carlson, M., Ferland, A., Hemingway, R., & Volk, D. (2003). Evidence-based practice: Beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviours of physical therapists. Physical Therapy, 83(9), 786–805.
  • Leach, M.J., Hofmeyer, A., & Bobridge, A. (2016). The impact of research education on student nurse attitude, skill and uptake of evidence-based practice: a descriptive longitudinal survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(1-2), 194-20.
  • Liu M., Kunaiktikula, W., Senaratanaa, W., Tonmukayakula, O., & Eriksenb, L. (2007). Development of competency inventory for registered nurses in the people's republic of china: Scale development. International Journal of Nursing
  • Studies, 44(5), 805-813.
  • McEvoy, M., Williams, M., & Olds, T. (2010). Evidence based
  • practice profiles: Differences among allied health professions.
  • BMC Medical Education, 10(69), 1-8.
  • Menlyk, B.M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2005). Evidence-based
  • Practice in Nursing Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice.
  • Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Menlyk, B.M., Fineout-Overholt, E., & Mays, M.Z. (2008). The evidence-based practice beliefs and implementation scales: Psychometric properties of two new instruments. Worldviews
  • on Evidence-Based Nursing, 5(4), 208–216.
  • Motta, P.C. (2003). Modelli di ricerca infermieristica ed evidence-
  • based nursing. Nursing Oggi, 8(2), 22-28.
  • Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2006). The Content Validity Index: Are
  • You Sure You Know What's Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29, 489- 497.
  • Pravikoff, D.S., Pierce, S.T., & Tanner, A. (2005). Evidence-based practice readiness study supported by academy nursing informatics expert panel. Nursing Outlook, 53(1), 49-50.
  • Profetto-McGrath, J. (2005). Critical thinking and evidence-based practice. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(6), 364-371. Ruzafa-Martinez, M., Lopez-Iborra, L., Moreno-Casbas, T., &
  • Madrigal-Torres, M. (2013). Development and validation of the competence in evidence based practice questionnaire (EBP-COQ) among nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 13:19, doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-19.
  • Sansoni, J. (2004). La ricerca in ambito infermieristico: base essenziale per lo sviluppo della conoscenza disciplinare e della professione. Professioni Infermieristiche, 57(4), 202-210.
  • Sperber, A.D. (2004). Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology, 126 (1 Suppl. 1), S124–S128.
  • Sousa, V.D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (2), 268–274.
  • Shaneyfelt, T., Baum, K.D., Bell, D., Feldstein, D., Houston, T.K., Kaatz, S., Whelan. C., & Green, M. (2006). Instruments for evaluating education in evidence-based practice: a systematic review. JAMA, 296(9), 1116–1127.
  • Upton, D., Upton, P., & Scurlock-Evans, L. (2014). The reach, transferability, and impact of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire: A methodological and narrative literature review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Available at: https://researchprofiles.canberra.edu.au/en/publications/the- reach-transferability-and-impact-of-the-evidence-based-practi. Accessed date: 25 June 2018.